Archive for the ‘Laa ilaha illAllaah’ Category

Dream of Abraham was not from Allah

Posted: March 10, 2016 by millatibraheem in Laa ilaha illAllaah

Before proceeding, we must first ‘delete’ all that we have been taught and re-approach the Quran in a non-presumptive manner.  Let us allow the Quran to teach us and not expect the Quran to acknowledge our already held beliefs.

Here are some points to consider:

  • Nowhere does the Quran teach us that it was Allah who had given Prophet Abraham his dream to sacrifice his son
  • The Quran only tells us that Abraham had a dream and he asked his son what he thought about it:

And when he reached with him [the age of] exertion, he said, “O my son, indeed I have seen in a dream/manaamai that I sacrifice you. See what you think.” He said, “O my father, do as you are commanded. You will find me, if Allah wills, of the steadfast. (as-Saffat 37:102)

  • The fact that Prophet Abraham asked his son shows that he himself was skeptical:

“…See what you think.”

  • And the rest goes on as follows (as-Saffat 37:103-105):

So when they had both submitted, and he had laid him down on his forehead, We called out to him, ‘O Abraham! You have fulfilled the vision/ar-ro’ya.” Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good.

  • What we will read is that there was no mention of the sacrifice being taken place.  Allah ‘stopped’ the sacrifice before it even happened
  • Allah tells Prophet Abraham he had fulled filled the vision/ar-Ro’ya and not manaamai
  • From the beginning to the end, Allah does not say asked Abraham to sacrifice


To be continued…


‘Authubullaahi min ashShaytaan arRajeem.

Bismillaah arRaHmaan arRaHeem.

Allaahumma salay ‘ala Muhammad wa ‘ala aalay Muhammad kamaa salayta ‘ala aalay Ibraaheem innaka Hameedum Majeed.  Allaahumma baraak ‘ala Muhammad wa ‘ala aalay Muhammad kamaa baraakta ‘ala aali Ibraaheem innaka Hameedum Majeed.

The narrations regarding generations of khayr have been grossly misinterpreted by so-called “people of knowledge.”  They fabricated interpretations implying that the people in the early three generations [or centuries – qarn], were better than all other generations, or that they were the best of Muslims.  However, that is not what the Prophet said and nor does reality affirm with this erroneous interpretation.

The Prophet of Allaah never said they were the best Muslims.  A generation includes both Muslims and pagans.  It includes hypocrites and believers.  It includes the major sinners and minor sinners.  No sane person will say that these generations – or centuries – were sinless and upright people.

The worst tribulations in Muslim history took place in those times.  The craziest sects began in those generations.  The vilest of innovations was invented by the scholars of those times.

And, of course, numerous recorded wars, the looting, the pillaging, the killing and the murder of pious men, took place in those generations.

One just needs to think a little to put doubt upon the foolish claims by the innovators regarding the piety of the people within those times:

  • It was the people from the best of generations that murdered the third khalif Uthmaan bin ‘Affaan, the bearer of the two lights – Dhun Noorayn – who married two of Allaah’s Messengers daughters.
  • It was the people from the best of generations that murdered ‘Ammar bin Yasir, who was from the earliest of Muslims and his parents being the first recorded martyrs [shuhaada].  ‘Ammar had fought alongside the Prophet in numerous battles against the polytheists, except only to be murdered by Muslims from the best of generations.
  • It was the people from the best of generations that murdered another of the earliest of Muslims – ‘Ali bin Abi Taalib.
  • It was the people from the best of generations that murdered Husayn bin ‘Ali bin Abi Taalib and his family.
  • It was people from those generations that murdered ‘Abdullaah bin al-Zubayr and his supporters in Mecca.
  • It was them who murdered Jaabir bin ‘Abdullaah.
  • It was them who murdered the pious child of the great muhajir Khubayb.
  • What about the civil wars between the Companions and others within those three generations?

Didn’t Allaah aza wajal say:

وَمَن يَقْتُلْ مُؤْمِنًا مُّتَعَمِّدًا فَجَزَاؤُهُ جَهَنَّمُ خَالِدًا فِيهَا وَغَضِبَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَلَعَنَهُ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُ عَذَابًا عَظِيمًا

And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell to abide therein, and the Wrath and the Curse of Allaah are upon him, and a great punishment is prepared for him.

And these are just a few historical accounts from hundreds of other incidents.  Reality contradicts false scholarly interpretations that are an insult to the Prophethood and his purity.


Comments section fixed

Posted: November 25, 2014 by millatibraheem in Laa ilaha illAllaah

The comments were being sent to spam automatically and now it has been fixed.

Difference Between a Liar and a Truthful Person

Posted: October 7, 2012 by millatibraheem in Laa ilaha illAllaah

Authubillaahi min ash-Shaytaani rajeem

Bismillaahi ar-Rahmaan ar-Raheem, as-Salaatu was-Salaam ‘ala Rasulullaah

Allaah aza wa jal says:

وَقَالُوا لَن يَدْخُلَ الْجَنَّةَ إِلَّا مَن كَانَ هُودًا أَوْ نَصَارَىٰ ۗ تِلْكَ أَمَانِيُّهُمْ ۗ قُلْ هَاتُوا بُرْهَانَكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ

And they say, “None will enter Paradise except one who is a Jew or a Christian.” That is their wishful thinking, Say, “Produce your proof, if you are truthful.”

Allaah aza wa jal links proof with being truthful.

This should be applied in all spheres of Islaamic knowledge.  It is obligatory to produce the proof when speaking about Islaam.  Where is the Wahee?

Whenever someone one speaks about Islaam, it must be based upon Qur’aan and Sunnah.  Where is the Speech of Allaah aza wa jal?  Where is the speech of Rasoolullaah (s)?

Whether it is a Sahaabi’s narration or a view of a scholar, everything must be verified with the Qur’aan and Sunnah to see if they were correct.

Allaah aza wa jal promises to protect the Dhikr, which is what He aza wa jal sent down.   The  narrations of Sahaabah or scholars are not revelation from Allaah aza wa jal and they are not protected.

Are All Sunni Madhhahib Upon the Haq?

Posted: April 6, 2012 by millatibraheem in Laa ilaha illAllaah

Authubillaahi min ash-Shaytaani rajeem

Bismillaahi ar-Rahmaan ar-Raheem, as-Salaatu was-Salaam ‘ala Rasulullaah

The popular Sunni claim is that all four of their Madhhahib are correct and anyone who follows one of them is upon the truth.

This belief  is grossly flawed.  Anyone who knows the basic rulings derived through each Madhhab will understand the major contradictions and fragility of their Usool.

Allaah aza wajal says [an-Nisaa’ 4:82]:

أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ الْقُرْآنَ ۚ وَلَوْ كَانَ مِنْ عِندِ غَيْرِ اللَّهِ لَوَجَدُوا فِيهِ اخْتِلَافًا كَثِيرًا

“Then do they not reflect upon the Quraan? If it had been from other than Allaah, they would have found within it much contradiction”

Here Allaah aza wajal is exclaiming the greatness of Islaam and one of its illuminating attributes, that there is no contradictions, inconsistencies, discrepancies or conflicting statements in it.  So how can it be possible that all the Sunni Madhhahib be correct even though they are full of contradictions and built upon discrepant principles?

One Madhhab declares something to be Haraam while the other states it is permissible.  One ruling claims an action to be waajib or Sunnah, while the other says it is not.  Yet, oddly they all are correct and upon Haq?

A simple example is if niyya (intention) is a condition of  Wudhu’ (ablution) being valid.  Maalikis,  Shaafi’is and Hanbalis considered it a condition while Hanafis said it is not.  This means with three Madhhahib, Wudhu’ is unacceptable without niyya, hence,  resulting in one’s prayer to be invalid.

Another example is if madmada (rinsing the mouth) and istinshaaq (snuffing water) during Wudhu’ is obligatory or preferred but not mandatory.  Hanbalis say they are obligatory while Hanafis, Maalikis and Shaafi’is say they are recommended.  Therefore, determining whether one’s Wudhu’ is valid or not,  consequently affecting the prayer itself.

And one does not need to look attentively to realise they differ in almost every aspect of the Deen, rendering it to be lost amongst their disputes and contaminated Usool.

Are they all upon Haq? Truly not.  In fact, they are extremely misguided and deserve the torment and punishment like their forefathers, the Jews, Christians and the Polytheists [al-Baqara 2:176]:

ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّ اللَّهَ نَزَّلَ الْكِتَابَ بِالْحَقِّ ۗ وَإِنَّ الَّذِينَ اخْتَلَفُوا فِي الْكِتَابِ لَفِي شِقَاقٍ بَعِيدٍ

“That is because Allaah has sent down the Book in truth. And indeed, those who differ over the Book are in extreme dissension

This differing of theirs is evidence of Allaah aza wajal’s misguidance and His disgrace upon them as He did to their forefathers due to the very same reason [al-Baqara 2:213]:

كَانَ النَّاسُ أُمَّةً وَاحِدَةً فَبَعَثَ اللَّهُ النَّبِيِّينَ مُبَشِّرِينَ وَمُنذِرِينَ وَأَنزَلَ مَعَهُمُ الْكِتَابَ بِالْحَقِّ لِيَحْكُمَ بَيْنَ النَّاسِ فِيمَا اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ ۚ وَمَا اخْتَلَفَ فِيهِ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ أُوتُوهُ مِن بَعْدِ مَا جَاءَتْهُمُ الْبَيِّنَاتُ بَغْيًا بَيْنَهُمْ ۖ فَهَدَى اللَّهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لِمَا اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ بِإِذْنِهِ ۗ وَاللَّهُ يَهْدِي مَن يَشَاءُ إِلَىٰ صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيمٍ

“Mankind was one community; then Allaah sent the prophets with good tidings and warnings and sent down with them the Scripture in truth to judge between the people concerning that in which they differed. And none differed over the Scripture except those who were given it – after the clear proofs came to them – out of jealous animosity among themselves. And Allaah guided those who believed to the truth concerning that over which they had differed, by His permission. And Allaah guides whom He wills to a straight path”

The Prophet (s) has no association with them and he is their opposite [al-An’aam 6:159]:

إِنَّ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعًا لَّسْتَ مِنْهُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ ۚ إِنَّمَا أَمْرُهُمْ إِلَى اللَّهِ ثُمَّ يُنَبِّئُهُم بِمَا كَانُوا يَفْعَلُونَ

Indeed, those who have divided their Deen and become denominations – you [O Muhammad] have no concern with them in anything. Their affair is only to Allaah ; then He will inform them about what they used to do.

Shirk (Polytheism) in Judaism

Posted: January 17, 2012 by millatibraheem in Laa ilaha illAllaah

Bismillaah, as-Salaatu was-Salaam ‘ala Rasulullaah

Shirk, or Polytheism, in Islaam is defined as giving the Rights of Allaah Ta’ala to another object.  It literally means not singling out or adding to something [ ‘Sha Ra Ka’ – Mu’jam Maqaais al-Lughah Vol 3].

Allaah Ta’ala said

فلا تجعلوا لله أندادا وأنتم تعلمون

“…Then do not set up rivals (andaad) to Allaah while you know”

Therefore, it is to set up rivals, likeness or equals to Allaah Ta’ala in any way.

The Jews cunningly try to pass themselves as being followers of Ibraheem alayhis salaam, being upon the monotheistic way of life.  Allaah Ta’ala has refuted this claim of theirs over and over again in the Qur’aan.  In Surah al-Baqarah, Allaah Ta’ala said

ما كان إبراهيم يهوديّا ولا نصرانيّا ولكن كان حنيفا مسلما وما كان من المشركين

Abraham was not  a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a true Muslim Hanifa  and he was not from the polytheists


وقالوا كونوا هودا أو نصارى تهتدوا قل بل ملة إبراهيم حنيفا وما كان من المشركين

And they say, “Be Jews or Christians, then you will be guided.” Say, “Nay, (We follow) only the religion of Abraham, Hanifa, and he was not of the polytheists

If one looks through the Jewish scriptures, even inattentively, the numerous polytheistic, anthropomorphic and theomorphic verses become quite apparent.  In Genesis 1:26, it is said

וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, נַעֲשֶׂה אָדָם בְּצַלְמֵנוּ כִּדְמוּתֵנוּ; וְיִרְדּוּ בִדְגַת הַיָּם וּבְעוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם, וּבַבְּהֵמָה וּבְכָל-הָאָרֶץ, וּבְכָל-הָרֶמֶשׂ, הָרֹמֵשׂ עַל-הָאָרֶץ.

And God said: ‘Let us make man in our image, in our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.’

This verse in the Torah represents one of the first instances into the gross heresy of the Jewish teachings.  It states “ka shibhina” meaning “in our likeness” implying that the form of the creatures is similar to the form of the Creator.

And in Genesis 6:1-4

וַיְהִי כִּי-הֵחֵל הָאָדָם, לָרֹב עַל-פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה; וּבָנוֹת, יֻלְּדוּ לָהֶם.

וַיִּרְאוּ בְנֵי-הָאֱלֹהִים אֶת-בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם, כִּי טֹבֹת הֵנָּה; וַיִּקְחוּ לָהֶם נָשִׁים, מִכֹּל אֲשֶׁר בָּחָרוּ.

וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה, לֹא-יָדוֹן רוּחִי בָאָדָם לְעֹלָם, בְּשַׁגַּם, הוּא בָשָׂר; וְהָיוּ יָמָיו, מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה.

 הַנְּפִלִים הָיוּ בָאָרֶץ, בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם, וְגַם אַחֲרֵי-כֵן אֲשֶׁר יָבֹאוּ בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים אֶל-בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם, וְיָלְדוּ לָהֶם:  הֵמָּה הַגִּבֹּרִים אֲשֶׁר מֵעוֹלָם, אַנְשֵׁי הַשֵּׁם.

And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives, whomsoever they chose.  And the LORD said: ‘My spirit shall not abide in man for ever, for that he also is flesh; therefore shall his days be a hundred and twenty years.’ The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them; the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.

Many may claim the language to be figurative.  Saying that the ‘sons of God’ or gods as angels and celestial bodies.  However, this does not solve the apparent heretical belief within the verse.

Again in Genesis 3:22

 וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֱלֹהִים, הֵן הָאָדָם הָיָה כְּאַחַד מִמֶּנּוּ, לָדַעַת, טוֹב וָרָע; וְעַתָּה פֶּן-יִשְׁלַח יָדוֹ, וְלָקַח גַּם מֵעֵץ הַחַיִּים, וְאָכַל, וָחַי לְעֹלָם.

And the LORD God said: ‘Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil; and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever.’

Also, the outrageous kind of Trinity represented in Genesis 18:1-3 while discussing the three visitors to Abraham

וַיֵּרָא אֵלָיו יְהוָה, בְּאֵלֹנֵי מַמְרֵא; וְהוּא יֹשֵׁב פֶּתַח-הָאֹהֶל, כְּחֹם הַיּוֹם

And the LORD appeared unto him by the terebinths of Mamre, as he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day

This addresses three as one, as the Lord appearing, contradicting the other verses mentioning three separate angelic guests. And further

וַיִּשָּׂא עֵינָיו, וַיַּרְא, וְהִנֵּה שְׁלֹשָׁה אֲנָשִׁים, נִצָּבִים עָלָיו; וַיַּרְא, וַיָּרָץ לִקְרָאתָם מִפֶּתַח הָאֹהֶל, וַיִּשְׁתַּחוּ, אָרְצָה

 וַיֹּאמַר:  אֲדֹנָי, אִם-נָא מָצָאתִי חֵן בְּעֵינֶיךָ–אַל-נָא תַעֲבֹר, מֵעַל עַבְדֶּךָ.

and he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood over against him; and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed down to the earth, and said: ‘My lord, if now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant.

Abrahams bowing down before them and saying ‘My lord’ is equivalent to committing polytheism.  No matter how one interprets these verses, whether they were humans, angels as humans, or one Lord appearing as three, does not clear away the polytheism.

It should be mentioned that these verses are used as support by the Christians for their doctrine of Trinity.

Genesis 18:8 states

 וַיִּקַּח חֶמְאָה וְחָלָב, וּבֶן-הַבָּקָר אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה, וַיִּתֵּן, לִפְנֵיהֶם; וְהוּא-עֹמֵד עֲלֵיהֶם תַּחַת הָעֵץ, וַיֹּאכֵלוּ

And he took curd, and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat.

A practice many Rabbis see as prohibited.

Further more shocking statements also occur in Exodus 4:22-23

 וְאָמַרְתָּ, אֶל-פַּרְעֹה:  כֹּה אָמַר יְהוָה, בְּנִי בְכֹרִי יִשְׂרָאֵל

וָאֹמַר אֵלֶיךָ, שַׁלַּח אֶת-בְּנִי וְיַעַבְדֵנִי, וַתְּמָאֵן, לְשַׁלְּחוֹ–הִנֵּה אָנֹכִי הֹרֵג, אֶת-בִּנְךָ בְּכֹרֶךָ

And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh: Thus saith the LORD: Israel is My son, My first-born. And I have said unto thee: Let My son go, that he may serve Me; and thou hast refused to let him go. Behold, I will slay thy son, thy first-born.’

One wonders on what grounds do the Jews have the audacity to denounce Christians and their invention of Trinity, while the very Torah speaks of their Lord saying ‘Israel is my son’

The major crooked and gross beliefs the Christian religion consists of, were pioneered by their Jewish counterparts.

(To be continued inshAllaah)